Authorship and contributions
Authorship is limited to people who made a substantial intellectual contribution, approved the final version and accept responsibility for the work.
Research integrity, transparent funding disclosure, editorial independence and responsible correction of the scientific record.
Authorship is limited to people who made a substantial intellectual contribution, approved the final version and accept responsibility for the work.
Submissions must be original and not under consideration elsewhere. Fabrication, falsification and substantial undisclosed plagiarism are unacceptable.
Research involving humans or animals must report appropriate ethics approval and informed consent where required.
Applicable clinical trials must report registration in a publicly accessible registry in accordance with current international recommendations.
Authors, reviewers and editors disclose financial and non-financial relationships that could influence professional judgment.
Funding sources and the sponsor’s role must be disclosed. Sponsors must not influence editorial decisions.
Publication decisions are based on scientific quality, methodology and relevance, not on advertising or commercial interests.
Editors take no part in assessing their own manuscripts or work where they have a conflict of interest.
When significant errors or misconduct are identified, the journal uses transparent corrections, expressions of concern and retractions.
Potential misconduct allegations are handled confidentially and documented. Where appropriate, the editors may contact the author’s institution.
The journal supports transparent reporting of data, analytical methods and data availability where ethically and legally permissible.
AI systems cannot be listed as authors. Authors remain responsible for the work and disclose substantial use of AI tools.
Advertising and sponsored content are clearly separated from scientific content and do not influence publication decisions.
Authors, reviewers and readers may send complaints about the journal's processes or editorial decisions to nbmhjournal@nbmhjournal.org. Each complaint is handled by an editor who was not involved in the original decision, and the journal responds within a reasonable time. Authors may appeal a decision once, with a reasoned explanation.
Journal content is backed up regularly and preserved in the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN) for long-term digital preservation of published articles.